Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Update.
Meanwhile, my doctor informed me (after finding a suspiciously tender area during a physical last week) that my liver enzyme tests came back normal (actually more normal than previously measured) and that I am not dying of hepatitis, which I was afraid of.
So, just for those keeping score:
DA's Office, 1. Me, 0.
Me, 1. Death, 0.
I guess I can live with that.
Friday, March 26, 2010
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Time to print up the "I'm With Stupak!" t-shirts. Also, Lady Gaga Lawsuit
Meanwhile, real news for liti-gaga-tors. I've decided to post links to the Fusari complaint and the Germanotta cross-complaint. At some point I am going to read through these and actually come to understand them.
Friday, March 19, 2010
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
It's not me, it's you!
This is no doubt a victory for the GID Reform movement. Genderkid comments:
This is a big improvement: the revision authors are stating that the problem is between a person’s identity and societal pressures, rather than within said person’s identity. I don’t know how they’ll manage to keep this diagnosis within a manual of mental disorders once they’ve recognized that it’s a larger societal issue, as well as a physical one. I guess they don’t know where to put trans people, yet they feel like they have to put us somewhere to maintain a sense of order. We’re just a reminder that human beings are a whole rather than distinct bits –bodies, minds, social beings– to be dealt with separately.
Speaking of which, I had this letter to the editor published in today's Galveston Daily News, in response to Heber Taylor's editorialabout Josh Davis's letter to the editor on Sunday:
Gays Shouldn’t Be ‘Kept In The Closet’
Thank you for the editorial by Heber Taylor (“Tolerance such a bad thing?” The Daily News, March 14). I (almost necessarily) disagree with the letter to the editor by Josh Davis (“Keep the gay lifestyle out of Galveston,” The Daily News, March 14).
I’m a transgender, which means I feel strongly inside that I’m a woman, despite the fact that my birth certificate, driver’s license, etc. say otherwise. I still go to work as a man, and that is how many of my friends know me, even though I have felt strongly since I was a teenager that this isn’t a correct (or at least, fully adequate) description of who I am. In the past year, I have started to come out of the closet and have been truly amazed by the warmth I have felt from my friends and family.
Mr. Davis yearns for a past “when deviant behavior was kept in the privacy of your own home.” Looking forward at how I intend to live out the rest of my life, I cannot accept that — what kind of life is being a shut-in hermit?
Moreover, an article about Galveston published a few years ago described our city as a place where one could go do grocery shopping “in drag.” I can attest from personal experience that this is true; but still, a life lived at home, at the supermarket or (for a little variety) the “gay bars” still is not a particularly fulfilling life. Why settle?
I recently filed for city council in District 2 (under my “boy” name, since that is, after all, still my legal name). The main reason why I’m running is because I have some ideas about protecting our city’s environment and our neighborhoods, and about how a good, just and moral city government ought to work.
But, I also filed because I feel it’s essential to assert that, “alternative lifestyle” or not, I’m a whole person who will not be chained down by other people’s prejudice.
For what it’s worth, I too have an extended family. Many of my gay and transgender friends have families. The best way for Galveston to present itself as a pro-family community is to welcome all families. This may not make everyone comfortable, but it’s the right thing to do.
And thank you for saying that in your editorial, Mr. Taylor.
James “Gwen” Dallas
Galveston
Monday, March 15, 2010
Link Dump
Brains and Eggs calls it the "Texas Textbook Massacre." Among the victims of conservative political correctness, "transvestites, transsexuals, and who knows what else." Also, Thomas Jefferson.
Yup.
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Transgingerism
Online...
http://www.explosm.net/comics/1982/
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Monday, March 1, 2010
Friday, February 26, 2010
Craigslist
(also, why no "t4w" category, guys?)
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Monday, February 22, 2010
Friday, February 19, 2010
Things you wait a lifetime for
Not so every-day-low-low-prices.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Flip the Script
The weather was pleasant (a little cold this morning, for what it's worth) but still night-and-day different from how it has been much of this winter.
The letter carrier, for reasons unknown, decided to put my landlord's mail in my mailbox and my mail (apparently) in his.
I voted in a Republican Primary:

The stench apparently takes two years to wear off.
And then finally I decided to give Domino's Pizza a fair shake. Normally I hate Domino's, but they claim to be better than Papa John's. See:

The thing is, their pizza has really improved. I am still duty-bound to assert the superiority of Papa John's, but I think they have done enough to stave off the pizzapocalypse.
Friday, February 12, 2010
Best. News. Evar.
My doctor informed me that my testosterone is now in normal female range (so the estrogen dosing must be just about right!).
Random Thoughts
2. My friend Andrea asked me to critique her thoughts on the State of The Union address. It came out as a long-rambling-incoherent babble... and then we started talking about Iran. The short story with regard to the Islamic Republic is that I believe everything NPR says.
3. I have a new campaign e-mail address, and am working on appointing my friend Dave to be campaign treasurer. Let the hate-mail flow!
4. Neil Gaiman to write an episode of Doctor Who (probably early Series 6, coming in 2011). Hoping it will be as good as Douglas Adams' outing in 1979's The City of Death episodes.
5. Cristan Williams, who is always enlightening, sends out an e-mail comparing the number of Google searches for the term "shemale" (as in pr0n) versus "transgender" (as in moi, your webmistress) and comes to a startling conclusion -- although I suppose some might write it off as mere Kirk-and-Madsen-talking-point drivel:
Libya is the #1 place on earth that looks for shemales. In Libya, it’s against the law to be GLBT (punishable by up to 5 years in prison).
Here’s more on the top 10:
Pakistan: While transgender people just won a major equal rights victory, anything deemed to be a "homosexual" is punishable by death.
Sudan: If you are found to be GLBT in Sudan, you can receive up to 100 lashes and/or death.
Czech Republic: The Czech Republic is actually relatively good on TG issues.
Afghanistan: The penalty for being TG is death.Yemen: offers torture, public flogging and death to it's queer community.
Bangladesh: The penalty for being TG can range from ostracization, torture, life imprisonment and death.
Syria: Homosexuality is illegal and TGs are often viewed as being homosexual. However, the government has allowed TS people to transition.
Sri Lanka: While being TG is not illegal, TGs are often victims of harassment and discrimination.
Egypt: While the government has allowed a few TS women to transition, it has outlawed music by the Israeli transsexual, Dana International and the topic is very taboo. Individuals suspected of being gay can be locked up, tortured and sentenced to hard labor.
It should also be noted that all of these countries are exceedingly religious. So, here’s a question: Does living in a hyper-religious culture predispose one to TG porn?
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Run Away!!!!!
I have to confess to not having read Lori Gottlieb's book, but I did read her essay back when it was fresh. The new book-length version has attracted it's fair share of criticism lately; one of the more thoughtful critiques, by Julia Baird, is here.
Gottlieb is right, I think, in the basic point that the standards we set for ourselves -- and our partners -- can be unreasonable and have negative consequences. We live in a second-best world, and part of maturing is learning to accept things about people we may not necessary like or agree with.
But this passage from Baird's critique caught my eye:
This twisted thinking makes my head hurt. First, the only evidence offered to prove that women expect too much is anecdotal. Are some women too picky? Sure. People are shallow, unkind, and judgmental. But I don't know any women who have checklists. If they do, I imagine it's something most grow out of. If you will only date someone who looks like Brad Pitt, "earns a gazillion dollars, and makes your knees go weak every time you're together," as Gottlieb writes, then you're pirobably either 20 or stupid. Most of us just want to love and be loved. The data show that when it comes to money and education, women are in fact lowering their standards. A Pew study released Jan. 19 found that in 1970, 4 percent of wives earned more than their husbands. In 2007, 22 percent did. The percentage of women who had more education than their husbands rose from 20 to 28.
I had heard about this poll before and I had embraced it for two reasons: first, because obviously it would be nice to have a sugarmama; but second, because it shows some progress vis-a-vis gender roles.
That said, the point Baird is trying to make -- or at least the one I think she's trying to make -- is that there are some women out there who really need to raise their standards. It's really not a material issue and I wish Baird hadn't used economic figures. One of my friends makes a lot more money than her husband, but her beau is truly a sweet man -- a real catch. On the other hand, I have a co-worker (on my night job) whose boyfriend is in prison. And a lady in my neighborhood whose "man" doesn't seem to do a whole lot except disappear randomly and bum money off of her to buy pot. A friend-of-a-friend whose ex/baby daddy is bona fide bonkers. And don't even get me started on the boys my sister used to date (before snagging my brother-in-law, who I approve of greatly).
If "women need men the way fish need bicycles," then these women need these men about the way a fish needs the Gorton's Fisherman to show up in one of his industrial-sized floating fish-stick factories.
The point being, I can see how Lori Gottlieb may have a point. But, at the same time, if being overly picky about men is a problem.... then it really must be a nice problem to have. You know, right on par with not having enough space in the garage to stack all your hundred-dollar bills.
(I will allow more intellectual chicas the task of applying third-wave feminist notions, e.g. the intersectionality of class, to this debate.)
Monday, February 8, 2010
Sunday, February 7, 2010
MmmKayKayKay?
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/020610dntexgopwomen.3e00543.html
See, the thing is, Senator Hutchison is not really all that bad, but surrounded by a bunch of folks who are, for lack of a better word, a bunch of twits (I'm looking at you, Mrs. Palin).
I've voted for KayBay before. Because, frankly, voting for "Dancin'" Gene Kelley (back in 2000) seemed like more of a dereliction of my democratic duty than voting for a Republican.
She's not perfect, but KayBay has the guts to have, erm, nuance on the abortion issue. I'm not entirely sure her answers were coherent, but at least she didn't do the easy thing and demagogue the issue (I'm looking at you, Governor).
Women shouldn't vote for women just because women are women. But women should vote for a woman who is at least as competent as they guy she's running against.
Go Kay!
(Though I still reserve the right to - and probably will - vote for my former boss Bill White or Farouk Shami in the general election -- I don't really care who wins the Dem primary, because they're both good guys. And I'm definitely voting Kinky for Ag Comm if he wins his race!)
The Audacity of Nope!
1. John Gay, who is running for Congress from the 14th District of Texas (the seat is currently occupied by Dr. Ron Paul) came into my place-of-employ yesterday to introduce himself. Nice guy. Will probably vote for him in the primary.*
2. Homeboy and I disagree about a lot of stuff, though. I'm voting for the guy more as a protest and as a symbolic gesture in favor of grassroots commonsensicalism than ideology, or partisanship, or whatev.
3. I've often b.s.'ed about running for Congress. I went to law school and passed the bar exam, and although I decline to practice, being a lawyer makes me morally "fit" enough to be a legislator, right? I'm a (pre-transition, pre-op/non-op, MTF) transwoman, so you know that means I don't have any shocking skeletons in my closet (though I do have a lot of shoes). I still don't have a fantastic career yet, and you know what they say -- a politician is just a lawyer gone bad. And honey, I'm awful.
4. But I have more important things to do, like work (60 hours per week+), blog, play with my ham radios, do my tranny thang, find a girlfriend (yeah, I'm a big fat lesbian too), lose weight, watch football, lose weight WHILE watching football, etc etc.
5. So this blog is where I would say, what I would say, if I were campaigning for Congress. Also, other stuff.
* I actually consider myself a Democrat, and was a precinct chair and captain for Obama in 2008 before Hurricane Ike ruined everything. I'm voting in the GOP primary this year because it is the only way that I can legally vote against this guy twice in one year -- and boyhowdy, does he deserve every bit of scorn that I can throw.